• Home
    • APSA Public Statements
    • APSA Annual Meeting
    • 2024 US Elections
    • APSA Website
  • Journals
    • American Political Science Review
    • PS: Political Science & Politics
    • Perspectives on Politics
    • Journal of Political Science Education
    • Political Science Today
    • Public Scholars
    • Cambridge University Press
    • All Journals
  • Awards
    • Awards & Recognition
    • Centennial Center
    • Grants
  • People
    • Political Science Scholars
    • Career Paths
    • Member Spotlight ★
    • Obituaries
  • Diversity & Inclusion
    • APSA Oral History Project
    • Ralph Bunche Summer Institute
    • Diversity Fellowship Program
    • Fund for Latino Scholarship
    • First-Generation Scholars
  • Teaching
    • APSA Educate
    • Teaching Conference
    • Webinars
    • Workshops
    • Public Engagement
  • Tell Us Your Story!
Latest News
  • [ May 13, 2026 ] Last Call to Help Scholars Get to Boston in 2026 APSA
  • [ May 13, 2026 ] A Review and Analysis of the FY2027 President’s Budget Request Advocacy
  • [ May 13, 2026 ] Meet the 2026-2027 APSA Diversity Fellowship Program Spring Recipients Diversity Fellowship Program
  • [ May 12, 2026 ] Criminal Communication: Public Representations, Repertoires, and Regimes of Criminal Governance Journals
  • [ May 11, 2026 ] Travel and Research Grant: APSA Committee on the Status of Asian Pacific Americans Scholarship | Deadline: June 28, 2026 APSA Annual Meeting
  • [ May 11, 2026 ] Bent into Submission? Domestic Investors and Populist Governments Journals
HomeAPSAPolitics 365: Fostering Campus Climates for Student Political Learning and Engagement

Politics 365: Fostering Campus Climates for Student Political Learning and Engagement

February 3, 2018 APSA, Teaching, Teaching Civic Engagement Across the Disciplines Comments Off on Politics 365: Fostering Campus Climates for Student Political Learning and Engagement

Chapter 23: Politics 365: Fostering Campus Climates for Student Political Learning and Engagement

by Nancy Thomas, Tufts University and Margaret Brower, Tufts University

College level teaching for political knowledge and engagement happens in the context of a campus climate, a combination of the norms, behaviors, attitudes, structures, and external influences that shape the student experience. Yet little is known about the attributes of a robust campus climate for political engagement. From 2014 to 2016, researchers at Tufts University’s Institute for Democracy and Higher Education visited nine diverse colleges and universities selected for their high (and low) levels of electoral engagement, geography, institutional type, and students served. Based on interviews and focus groups with nearly 500 students, faculty members, and administrators, the researchers identified certain attributes of politically engaged institutions. Those attributes include structures to support student well-being and social cohesion; a commitment to diversity as an institutional priority and practice; habits of political discussions in and beyond the classroom; a strong commitment to both academic freedom and free expression; students as decision-makers, with shared responsibility for each other and for the institution; respectful responses to student activism, and; a celebratory attitude toward elections and political issues. Unsurprising are the findings regarding the critical role of faculty in cultivating relationships with students and positive conditions for learning, foundational to robust student political learning and engagement.

Download the book & read the full chapter.


About the Authors

Nancy Thomas directs the Institute for Democracy and Higher Education at Tufts University’s Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life, conducting research and providing assistance to colleges and universities to advance student political learning and participation in democracy. The institute’s signature initiative, the National Study of Learning, Voting, and Engagement (NSLVE), is a large dataset for research and provides each of the 1000+ participating colleges and universities with their students’ aggregate voting rates. Her work and scholarship center on higher education’s democratic mission, college student political learning and engagement, free speech and academic freedom, and deliberative democracy on campuses and in communities. She is the author of multiple book chapters, articles, and the monograph, Educating for Deliberative Democracy. She is an associate editor of the Journal of Public Deliberation and a senior associate with Everyday Democracy.  She received a BA in government from St. Lawrence University, her JD from Case Western Reserve University, and an EdD from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.

Margaret Brower is a researcher for the Institute for Democracy and Higher Education at Tisch College, Tufts University. She received her BA in political science and education from Colgate University. She then completed her MA in public policy and higher education at the University of Michigan. Currently, she is pursuing a doctorate degree in political science at the University of Chicago. At the University of Chicago, she continues to design and lead qualitative research studies.

 

Teaching Civic Engagement Across the Disciplines / Copyright ©2017 by the American Political Science Association

Previous

Concluding Chapter Summaries: Teaching Engagement Today

Next

Collaborative Civic Engagement: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Teaching Democracy with Elementary and University Students

Follow Us

  • X
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Recent Posts

  • Last Call to Help Scholars Get to Boston in 2026
  • A Review and Analysis of the FY2027 President’s Budget Request
  • Meet the 2026-2027 APSA Diversity Fellowship Program Spring Recipients
  • Criminal Communication: Public Representations, Repertoires, and Regimes of Criminal Governance
  • Travel and Research Grant: APSA Committee on the Status of Asian Pacific Americans Scholarship | Deadline: June 28, 2026

Journals

  • Criminal Communication: Public Representations, Repertoires, and Regimes of Criminal Governance

    May 12, 2026 0
    Criminal Communication: Public Representations, Repertoires, and Regimes of Criminal Governance By Philip Luke Johnson, Flinders University Criminal actors are widely assumed to maintain a low profile, exerting power through coercion and clandestine networks. Scholarship addressing [...]
  • Bent into Submission? Domestic Investors and Populist Governments

    May 11, 2026 0
    Bent into Submission? Domestic Investors and Populist Governments By Alison L. Johnston, Oregon State University and Juliet Johnson, McGill University Do populist governments bend their economic policies to the preferences of bondholders? Populist governments should [...]
  • Political Symbols and Social Order: Confederate Monuments and Performative Violence in the Post-Reconstruction U.S. South

    May 8, 2026 0
    Political Symbols and Social Order: Confederate Monuments and Performative Violence in the Post-Reconstruction U.S. South By Lee-Or Ankori-Karlinsky, Brown University Violent conflicts are often accompanied by symbols commemorating past violence. I argue that political symbols [...]

Copyright © I American Political Science Association

360640706

Loading Comments...