Political Science Now

A site from the American Political Science Association

  • Home
  • Journals
    • American Political Science Review
    • Perspectives on Politics
    • PS: Political Science & Politics
    • Journal of Political Science Education
  • Awards
  • Career Paths
  • People
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Tell Us Your Story!

APSA Fellowship with the Congressional Research Service

July 11, 2016 By APSA

PSC 49 V2 CoverThe latest virtual issue of PS features articles written by alumni of the Congressional Fellowship Program (CFP) from 2010 to 2015. The CFP fellows serve yearlong placements in congressional and executive offices, and they chronicle their firsthand experiences in the pages of PS. Enjoy the full virtual issue here.

APSA Fellowship with the Congressional Research Service

Anthony J MadonnaAnthony Madonna, The University of Georgia

“Serving as an APSA Congressional Fellow had been a goal of mine since I started graduate school. The fellowship provided an opportunity to examine the congressional policy-making process first hand. And while I had worked on congressional campaigns, in state legislative offices, and supervised student internships, I had no direct experience working on Capitol Hill for Congress. In addition, the program was highly recommended by senior colleagues who had served as fellows themselves. Nearly all of them had worked on the staffs of individual congressional members and found the experience served to better inform both their research and teaching. When I found out I would be serving as a fellow for the 2012–13 academic year, my plan was to spend that year in a congressional member office as well.

In addition to House or Senate member offices, the two-month fellowship orientation exposed me to other types of assignments fellows could receive. This included working for committees in either chamber, as well as legislative and executive branch agencies, like the Environmental Protection Agency, Congressional Budget Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Congressional Research Service, among others. Settling on a type of assignment was difficult, as each one had its own advantages. To make an informed decision on this question, I did what I do best: relentlessly hassled more knowledgeable people for advice. This included former fellows, undergraduate students, other political scientists, and friends from college and graduate school working on the Hill…” Read More.

  • Read more Capitol Hill Insights in PS: Political Science & Politics.
  • Learn more about the Congressional Fellowship Program.

PS: Political Science & Politics / Volume 46 / Issue 03 / July 2013, pp 700-701

Filed Under: Journals, people, PS: Political Science and Politics

A Glimpse of History: Working for the House Majority Whip in the Early Days of the 111th Congress

July 7, 2016 By APSA

PSC 49 V2 CoverThe latest virtual issue of PS features articles written by alumni of the Congressional Fellowship Program (CFP) from 2010 to 2015. The CFP fellows serve yearlong placements in congressional and executive offices, and they chronicle their firsthand experiences in the pages of PS. Enjoy the full virtual issue here.

A Glimpse of History: Working for the House Majority Whip in the Early Days of the 111th Congress

Bryan MarshallBryan W. Marshall, Miami University

“The rapidity, duration, and intensity of it all caught me by surprise. Nearly at a full run, I dashed through a corridor and down a winding staircase to my first morning meeting. I took a place along a wall with a few other staff, but my eyes were fixed upon the principals. Gathered around a vast table were the chairs, the majority leader, and my boss—the house majority whip. The discourse was mostly heavy—President Obama’s historic election, the burden of leadership, and the daunting task to balance politics and policy in order to deliver on the promises and hopes of the people who sent them. The immediate business was expanding children’s health insurance and a stimulus package to turn around an economy teetering on the brink. The majority leader was resolute. Congress would need to deliver bold actions in order to overcome the deep anxiety of the times and to build confidence for the long struggle ahead. The whip was equally resolute as he summoned back hard lessons from lost eras—Roosevelt’s New Deal and Truman’s Fair Deal. Congress could not allow mistakes of the past to be repeated. With a clear appreciation of history, the whip made the case for a 21st Century New Deal that ensured the poor and most vulnerable would not be left behind. No sooner did I try to reflect upon this special moment and it was time to rush off once again.” Read More.

 

Bryan W. Marshall is professor and Assistant Chair of the Department of Political Science at Miami University. His teaching and research focuses in the areas of Congress, congressional-executive relations, and quantitative methods.  Marshall’s recent articles appear in Social Science Quarterly, Legislative Studies Quarterly, Presidential Studies Quarterly, Journal of Theoretical Politics, American Politics Research, and Conflict Management and Peace Science.

  • Read more Capitol Hill Insights in PS: Political Science & Politics.
  • Learn more about the Congressional Fellowship Program.

PS: Political Science & Politics / Volume 43 / Issue 01 / January 2010, pp 183-186

Filed Under: Journals, people, PS: Political Science and Politics

Making Sense of the Hill: A Political Scientist in Politics

July 5, 2016 By APSA

The latest virtual issue of PS features articles written by alumni of the Congressional Fellowship Program (CFP) from 2010 to 2015. The CFP fellows serve yearlong placements in congressional and executive offices, and they chronicle their firsthand experiences in the pages of PS. Enjoy the full virtual issue here.

Making Sense of the Hill: A Political Scientist in Politics

PSC 49 V2 CoverJoshua Carstens Huder, University of Florida

“One of the first, and most frequent, questions asked of congressional fellows is: What do you want to get out of your fellowship? Fellowship Director Jeff Biggs, former fellows, professors, chiefs of staff, legislative directors, and members will, at one point or another, raise this topic. At an abstract level I had an answer: I sought a better understanding of the legislative process. But, at times, it felt like a trick question. At a practical level I had almost no idea what I was getting into. I had few expectations or preconceived notions about the lessons that would come over the next year. Without legislative experience to fall back on, setting out to accomplish a prearranged set of goals seemed impossible. So I took a different tact. Rather than search for expertise in a particular policy area or with a specific goal in mind, I sought a placement that would treat me unexceptionally. I set out to find an office assignment that would offer complete emersion as a congressional staffer. I fashioned myself as a miniature Clifford Geertz. I needed to get as close as possible to living the life of a full-time staffer, complete with long hours and a significant portfolio. After I came up for air at the end of my fellowship, I figured I will have learned lessons I did not necessary start out to find, but would nonetheless enhance my understanding of the institution and how those within it practice and perceive politics…” Read More.

  • Read more Capitol Hill Insights in PS: Political Science & Politics.
  • Learn more about the Congressional Fellowship Program.

PS: Political Science & Politics / Volume 46 / Issue 04 / October 2013, pp 875-876

Filed Under: Journals, people, PS: Political Science and Politics

Lest Congress Forgets: A Fellow’s Walk and Institutional Partisanship in Contemporary Representational Politics

July 1, 2016 By APSA

The latest virtual issue of PS features articles written by alumni of the Congressional Fellowship Program (CFP) from 2010 to 2015. The CFP fellows serve yearlong placements in congressional and executive offices, and they chronicle their firsthand experiences in the pages of PS. Enjoy the full virtual issue here.

Lest Congress Forgets: A Fellow’s Walk and Institutional Partisanship in Contemporary Representational Politics

PSC 49 V2 CoverTyson King-Meadows, University of Maryland Baltimore County

“Perhaps the most underappreciated dimension in public response to the post-Bush v. Gore controversies involving state election administration and Supreme Court jurisprudence involving the right to vote has been the central role of Congress in enforcing the Fifteenth Amendment. As a scholar of American electoral politics, legislative representation, and black political engagement, I sought placement with the House Committee on the Judiciary of the 113th Congress [hereafter the Judiciary Committee] to learn more about the history of congressional efforts to nationalize election standards and to protect voting rights. I was especially interested in examining how members of Congress thought about the recent spate of judicial rulings affecting federal election law and how members imagined the future of congressional action to address racial and socioeconomic disparities in participation and representation. Moreover, I relished the opportunity to work for Michigan Rep. John Conyers (Thirteenth District). Conyers is a founding member and the “Dean” of the Congressional Black Caucus, the first African American chair of and then-ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, the second most senior member of the House, and is a member of the original enacting coalition of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) of 1965…” Read More.

  • Read more Capitol Hill Insights in PS: Political Science & Politics.
  • Learn more about the Congressional Fellowship Program.

PS: Political Science & Politics / Volume 47 / Issue 01 / January 2014, pp 257-259

Filed Under: Journals, people, PS: Political Science and Politics

Political Science Election Forecasts of the 2016 Presidential and Congressional Elections

June 30, 2016 By APSA

Normally around this time in a presidential election cycle — the “interregnum,” as it has come to be known — we would be waiting for the dust from the nomination campaigns to settle before moving on to the conventions and to considerations of the general election race. As you may have noticed, however, this is not a normal year. It has been anything but. No dust, just tons of rubble from two wildly contentious nomination fights left to clear away as we turn to a general election bout likely to be the political equivalent of a mixed martial arts cage fight.

So who will emerge from the cage next November?

Read the rest of the story at Sabato’s Crystal Ball. This is part one of an ongoing series. The introduction is by James E. Campbell, a UB Distinguished Professor of Political Science at the University at Buffalo, SUNY. His previous books include The American Campaign and The Presidential Pulse of Congressional Elections. His latest book, Polarized: Making Sense of a Divided America, is forthcoming from Princeton University Press in July.

Filed Under: 2016 Elections, Journals, PS: Political Science and Politics

Capitol Hill Culture Shock: A Perspective from an Asian Fellow

June 24, 2016 By APSA

The latest virtual issue of PS features articles written by alumni of the Congressional Fellowship Program (CFP) from 2010 to 2015. The CFP fellows serve yearlong placements in congressional and executive offices, and they chronicle their firsthand experiences in the pages of PS. Enjoy the full virtual issue here.

PSC 49 V2 Cover

Capitol Hill Culture Shock: A Perspective from an Asian Fellow

Sa-ngopkarn Moungthong, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Kingdom of Thailand

“As an Asia Foundation-sponsored Thai fellow with a Foreign Service background, the obvious choice for my fellowship was with a member of the House of Representatives or the Senate who was a member of either the House Foreign Affairs or the Senate Foreign Relations Committees, and in particular the Asia-Pacific Subcommittee. That had always been my choice. But during one of the APSA Congressional Fellowship orientation sessions, when former fellows shared their experiences on Capitol Hill, I was exposed to a new idea. “The fellowship is yours, and it is up to you to make of it what you will,” said one of the former fellows. “Get out of your comfort zone and try something new,” said another on the same speaking panel. Those comments kept running through my mind when I was selecting potential offices for my fellowship. During my office selection period, I had prepared a wish list of offices I would like to work for, including both those related to Foreign Affairs and the Foreign Relations Committee, as well as those I hardly knew anything about and that had no direct connection with foreign affairs, but could potentially be good offices in which to work. Thanks to sequestration’s reduction of congressionally authorized staff positions, I was fortunate to get six interviews, and three offices offered to host me. The choice I had to make was between staying in my comfort zone and going for something new. In the end, I chose the latter…” Read More.

  • Read more Capitol Hill Insights in PS: Political Science & Politics.
  • Learn more about the Congressional Fellowship Program.

PS: Political Science & Politics / Volume 47 / Issue 03 / July 2014, pp 764-766

Filed Under: Journals, people, PS: Political Science and Politics

Capitol Hill Insights: Voices from the Congressional Fellowship Program

June 8, 2016 By APSA

CapPSC 49 V2 Final Cover_smallitol Hill Insights: Voices from the Congressional Fellowship Program

The second virtual issue of PS: Political Science & Politics is now available online!

Entitled “Capitol Hill Insights,” the issue features articles written by alumni of APSA’s Congressional Fellowship Program and published in PS between 2010 and 2015. Each of the 24 articles pivots to a unique perspective of the fellowship experience, providing rich details and first-hand anecdotes that clarify and explain how Congress and government work.

Established in 1953, the Congressional Fellowship Program brings select scholars and professionals to Washington, DC, each year to serve fellowship placements in congressional and other offices. The articles gathered here—written by alumni who are political scientists, journalists, health policy specialists, and other domestic and international professionals—illustrate the unique first-hand insights into Congress and the legislative process provided by the fellowship experience.

  • Read more Capitol Hill Insights in PS: Political Science & Politics.
  • Learn more about the Congressional Fellowship Program.

Filed Under: CFP, PS: Political Science and Politics

Legislative Error and the “Politics of Haste”

May 27, 2016 By APSA

PSC 492 Cover_Poster

Legislative Error and the “Politics of Haste”

Jonathan Lewallen, University of Texas at Austin

Legislative error is an important and understudied element of the policy process. Even simple clerical mistakes—if unnoticed before enactment—can lead to ambiguity about a law’s meaning, spark political battles concerning rulemaking and implementation, and involve the courts in statutory interpretation. Understanding how and why error occurs can help us better understand how political institutions are intertwined in the design, enactment, and implementation of public policy. This article analyzes the sources of legislative error using data on corrected legislation in the US Senate from 1981 to 2012. The author finds that Senate drafting error is related to unified control of Congress and new majority parties, inexperienced committee members, and committee workload. Funding for the Senate office that helps draft legislation also can affect legislative error. In addition to bringing in different perspectives and preferences, elections can affect a legislature’s ability to draft clear, error-free statutes.

[Read more]

PS: Political Science & Politics / Volume 49 / Issue 02 / April 2016, pp 239-243 / Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016

 

Filed Under: APSA, Journals, PS: Political Science and Politics

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • …
  • 34
  • Next Page »

Follow us on Twitter

My Tweets

Popular

  • Call for Applications: Special Projects Fund
  • Chart of the Month: Changes in Degrees Awarded
  • Reputational Rankings of Peer-Reviewed Law Journals
  • Public Engagement Profile: Gender Watch 2018
  • Five Laws of Politics
  • Faculty Constitutions in the Ivory Tower
  • APSA Awards: Submit Nominations for the 2018 Barbara Sinclair Lecture
  • Meet 2018 RBSI Scholar, Flavio Jimenez
  • Building Neural Networks in R for Political Research
  • A Discussion of Josiah Ober’s The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece
  • Lets Be Heard

Around the web

  • Monkey Cage
  • Scholars Strategy Network
The NRA sees a bleak Hobbesian world. So why does it want to arm individuals with guns?
19 April 2018 - Christopher R. Hallenbrook and Ryan Reed
Pompeo’s visit suggests the Trump-Kim summit is on track. Here’s why Kim is ready to talk.
18 April 2018 - John Delury
I did the first long-term study investigating illegal ivory traders. Here’s what I learned.
18 April 2018 - Kristof Titeca
Russians are actually getting less xenophobic
18 April 2018 - Hannah S. Chapman
Why Austria’s response to the Skripal poisoning wasn’t so tough on Russia
18 April 2018 - Stephanie Liechtenstein
Why China, Japan and Korea fuss over tiny islands — 4 things to know
17 April 2018 - Tim Liao
Putin wants a shining legacy. He has to solve 3 big problems first.
17 April 2018 - Philipp Casula and Camille-Renaud Merlen
Why do we need new rules on shipping emissions? Well, 90 percent of global trade depends on ships.
17 April 2018 - Jessica F. Green
How to make sense of our collapsing global order
17 April 2018 - Heather Hurlburt
How did voters register their protest in Egypt’s presidential election?
16 April 2018 - Elizabeth R. Nugent
No items.

Around the web

  • Retraction Watch
  • The Plot
  • Crooked Timber
Political science has a #metoo moment
19 April 2018 - Alison McCook
Research problems at Australian university hit the news
19 April 2018 - Victoria Stern
Caught Our Notice: Why did Reuters remove a 3.5-year-old story?
18 April 2018 - Alison McCook
Nutrition paper claims intervention cuts child obesity. Experts disagree.
18 April 2018 - Alison McCook
“Youth Guru” loses turkey-neck paper that overlapped with book chapter
17 April 2018 - amarcus41
Don’t like a paper, but don’t want to retract it? Just issue an “editorial statement”
17 April 2018 - Nick Stockton
Caught Our Notice: Forged email for corresponding author dooms diabetes paper
16 April 2018 - Alison Abritis
Whoops: Authors didn’t mean to include new data in article about transgender identity
16 April 2018 - Victoria Stern
Weekend reads: Unauthorized vaccine trial leads to criminal investigation; outrage over a skeleton study; how much plagiarism is OK?
14 April 2018 - Ivan Oransky
Caught Our Notice: JAMA warns readers about all of Brian Wansink’s papers in its journals
13 April 2018 - Ivan Oransky
If the national economy is the same for everyone, why is there so much disagreement?
28 July 2016 - David Fortunato
A risk worth taking? The effect of information in the Brexit referendum
18 July 2016 - Davide Morisi
Legal scrubbing or renegotiation? A text-as-data analysis of how the EU smuggled an investment court into its trade agreement with Canada
24 March 2016 - Wolfgang Alschner
Partisan motivated reasoning drives opinions on climate change among citizens and elites in the US
9 March 2016 - Toby Bolsen
“Ivan S., rapist, soon to be Swiss” or when male migrants are pictured as a sexual danger
25 February 2016 - Oriane Sarrasin
Double Effort for Ethnic Minorities to Get Job Interviews
23 February 2016 - Didier Ruedin
On the Difficulty of Forecasting “Winners” in Parliamentary Elections
18 February 2016 - Garrett Glasgow
Immigration and the Demise of Political Trust
16 February 2016 - Lauren McLaren
Cabinet Formation and Portfolio Distribution in European Multiparty Systems
10 February 2016 - Florian Hollenbach
The State and Future of Political Methodology
25 January 2016 - Andreas Murr
Economics in Two Lessons, Chapter 9
19 April 2018 - John Quiggin
Spiritualism and Uncanny Fiction
16 April 2018 - John Holbo
Blowing stuff up
15 April 2018 - John Quiggin
Sunday photoblogging: woods outside Madison, Wisconsin
15 April 2018 - Chris Bertram
Hackery or heresy
9 April 2018 - John Quiggin
The History of the Uncanny Valley?
9 April 2018 - John Holbo
Economics in Two Lessons, Chapter 8
8 April 2018 - John Quiggin
Who has any use for conservative intellectuals?
5 April 2018 - Henry
Some thoughts for #WAAD
2 April 2018 - Ingrid Robeyns
Happy Easter!
1 April 2018 - John Holbo

Copyright © 2018 · American Political Science Association